ENTERTAINMENT/FILM/REVIEWS

A BLACK MAN’S REVIEW OF…
QUANTUM OF SOLACE

Movie Biases: C’mon now – you tell me!

Major Players: Daniel Craig, Judi Dench, Jeffrey Wright, co-writer Paul Haggis, director Marc Forster.

Logline: Avenging the death of his duplicitous love Vesper Lynd, James Bond (Craig) pursues a wealthy, shady environmentalist (Mathieu Amalric) who’s cutting deals with the CIA, Bolivian government, and a nefarious, power-hungry dictator (Joaquin Cosio) while possibly leading Bond to the shadowy host organization behind it all.

The Deal:
“I need to know I can trust you.” – M (Dench) to James Bond. How apropos. Kicking off with a frenetic Aston Martin-Alfa Romeo car chase beginning, “Solace” offers the hope, if not promise, that the Bond franchise reboot is more than the fluke that was “Casino Royale.” Despite Bond staples such as exotic locales (Italy, Haiti, Austria, Bolivia, Russia) shaken and not stirred with only the finest suits, hotels, and women, the most rugged, brutal Bond (movie) ever (and first ever sequel, picking up moments after the end of “Royale”) features some definite “wow” moments, but not a cohesive, collective “wow.”

“There’s something horribly efficient about you,” states badass Bond chick/fellow vengeance-seeker Camille (Olga Kurylenko) of Bond. Same could be said of this movie, one where the parts play greater than the whole. David Arnold’s (“Casino Royale”) unrelenting score is a perfectly tense supporting character. “Solace” is cut from “The Bourne Ultimatum” school of action editing, but a little too much so, to the point it’s hard to get your bearings with the relentless pacing of action; it’s good for a scene or two, but not for multiple ten minute segments. I like a movie dedicated to action, but it must be COMPREHENSIBLE action. Amalric’s bug-eyed environmental terrorist villain follows the newer Bondian antagonist model favoring sociopolitical devastation to worldwide domination, this one specializing in the destabilization of Third World economies and governments in a labyrinthine plot that defies explanation, if not comprehension.

Daniel Craig’s Bond is a joyless warrior, plowing through challenge after challenge with almost robotic athleticism, a one man Terminator of a remorseless killing machine. Imprisoned by his own inconsolable rage and general distrust of everyone, Craig does everything asked of him, albeit with little humor or joy found in the last Bond movie, having gone Palin – I mean rogue – in a fashion where “everything [he] touch[es] seems to wither and die.” We get that Bond’s steely heart has been broken therefore everyone must pay, but I miss the hint of impish recklessness that made Craig’s Bond so accessible and, well, human in the first movie, shattered heart be damned.

His performance, like so many elements in this movie, takes its cues from director Marc Forster. Yes, that Marc Forster of “Finding Neverland.” Yes, that Marc Forster of “The Kite Runner.” Yes, that Marc Forster of the small dramas with Oscar cachet (“Monster’s Ball”), an inspired choice for an action franchise that now seems content to continually reinvent itself. With all the propulsive action onscreen, Forster could be merely overcompensating for his reputation, if not his very nature, as a drama guy. At times, this unorthodox Bond director background plays beautifully, as in an operatic, “Fifth Element”-like action sequence set to an aria during an opera itself. For the most part, the risk the Broccolis took as producers to hire Forster doesn’t quite pay off like it should for a $200 million extension of a global franchise.

Not that it’s entirely Forster’s fault. “Solace” is trapped under the weight of its own outsized expectations with “Casino Royale” having set the bar impossibly high with its franchise goosing reboot in ‘06. To put it into perspective, imagine “The Dark Knight” NOT being as good as “Batman Begins,” the Batman franchise reboot with Christian Bale (don’t – we know it’s BETTER). If you can imagine that, then you can visualize what “Quantum of Solace” will mean to the Bond fan. Mix in the abject waste of a scowling Jeffrey Wright, the most athletic James Bond in history, and a decent Alicia Keys song, find not solace in “Quantum.” Just rewatch “Casino Royale.”

@@ REELS

(TWO REELS)

Extra medium.

UTC’s resident film critic Edwardo Jackson is the author of the novels EVER AFTER and NEVA HAFTA, (Villard/Random House), a writer for The 213 Magazine, and an LA-based screenwriter. Visit his website at www.edwardojackson.com where his new novel I DO? is available NOW.


Leave a Comment

Comments

November 15th, 2008 at 1:01 am SweetSis says:

I’m trying to see this. That white boy is a cutie.

November 15th, 2008 at 6:36 am SERIOUSLEE says:

TONIGHT!

November 15th, 2008 at 8:50 am PATTY CAKE says:

Marc Forster is a really odd but intriquing choice. I’m not usually a Bond fan, but I do like Daniel Craig from his indie work and am a fan of Forster so will check it out. Thanks Edwardo.

November 15th, 2008 at 11:28 am Jalissa Lareaux says:

Daniel Craig is the sexiest Bond, no doubt

November 15th, 2008 at 12:42 pm UncleD says:

Yeah I’m not with the way Craig plays Bond. He’s in full Jason Bourne mode. I like my Bond a little mischievous. But it was still good to see some action and all the toys and the music etc. I’m not mad at it but I’m not championing it either.

November 15th, 2008 at 1:11 pm Justine Henry says:

thats as pretty low score Im surprised csince u love ur testosterone!

November 15th, 2008 at 2:22 pm Hallow says:

a lil mindless action never hurt nobody!

November 15th, 2008 at 3:08 pm Diallo Tyson says:

Wait, so they brought in Marc Forster to amp up the action? Doesn’t make much sense. Seems like he would bring out the emotional notes. I’ll catch it on Netflix in four months.

November 15th, 2008 at 4:50 pm culturepop says:

I should have read this before I saw the matinee today

November 15th, 2008 at 9:57 pm CeaseNYC says:

Saw it last nite. I knew in the first 10 minutes that it was gonna be aight but not great. I mean, it was cool but didn’t set the world on fire. Two reels for real.

November 16th, 2008 at 12:03 am Tawnie says:

Ditto SweetSis & Jallisa but I’ll still poilly wait til DVD

November 16th, 2008 at 6:42 am nicq says:

I think this one will be tight imma catch it tonight by myself lol bcuz i dont have my big sis to go to movies with anymore!

November 16th, 2008 at 8:03 am SMARTA$$ says:

The bourne altimatum was the best!

November 16th, 2008 at 10:28 am Mr.Fantastic says:

dnt lok like sum ill go watch

November 16th, 2008 at 1:37 pm Elsa Harkins says:

I really liked it – but I’m not a conniseur of action or Bond so maybe I don’t have much to go on – but just as good eye candy action – I liked it.

November 17th, 2008 at 11:11 am Ashley says:

I haven’t been into bond since Pierce Brosnan took over the role. They just can’t get it right.

November 17th, 2008 at 11:29 am Ingrid says:

It was too much blood for blood sake and I agree the plot was hard to follow

November 17th, 2008 at 7:34 pm Stephanie says:

I’m with you..actually I would have give it 1 reel!

December 3rd, 2008 at 10:03 pm Cameron Turner says:

“Joyless warrior” says it all. I realize that the producers wanted to re-calibrate Bond for the “Bourne Identity” era but they have re-invented Bond so fully that he bears no resemblance to the original character. Daniel Craig is not playing the same guy made famous by Connery, Moore and Brosnan. I enjoy these new movies as bare-knuckle actioners, but I don’t relate to them as James Bond movies. Therefore I’m not really interested. I’ve got my fingers crossed that the new “Star Trek” won’t abandon its original (and beloved!) source material the way the 007 flicks have.

Related Material

Related Posts

Tag Cloud

Archival

Blog Archives by Month

Other UTC Blogs