ENTERTAINMENT/FILM/REVIEWS

A Black Man’s Review Of
“The Mummy: Tomb Of The Dragon Emperor.”

THE MUMMY: TOMB OF THE DRAGON EMPEROR (PG-13)

Movie Biases:
Sorta sold.

Major Players:
Brendan Fraser, Jet Li, Michelle Yeoh, director Rob Cohen

Logline:
Retired spy/adventurer couple Rick & Evelyn O’Connell (Fraser & Maria Bello) are coaxed out of retirement to escort a precious artifact to Shanghai where it’s used to awaken the slumbering, immortality-chasing dynastic Emperor Han (Li) - recently discovered by the O’Connells’ estranged son Rick (Luke Ford) - to resume his millennia old agenda of worldwide domination via use of his also-mummified Terracotta stone warriors. Or something like that.

The Deal:
I recently had an argument with someone (Myra - oops. Did I say that out loud??) who lobbied that “The Mummy” franchise was just as good and entertaining as the “Indiana Jones” series. Yep - I had to pick my jaw up off the floor, too, to even conceive of participating in such a conversation. Anyways, it prompted me to revisit the first two “Mummy” movies (and my reviews), which surprised me in how well they’ve held up as far as “ah, the hell with it” entertainment value. But with the startlingly uninspired “Dragon Emperor,” (cough! Myra!)’s argument, and the franchise, don’t have a leg to stand on, even if they were centipedes.

Nothing feels organic about this “Mummy,” which is saying a lot seeing how the first two were obvious copycats of the “Indiana Jones” school of serialized, old school adventure flicks. But at least those two looked like and were having FUN. Where’s the adventure? Where’s the humor? “Dragon Emperor’s” script, credited to TV’s “Smallville” duo of Alfred Gough and Miles Millar, is lame and pedestrian at best. While the action set pieces of the franchise have always been mere fodder for theme park rides, in the hands of talented hack Rob Cohen - he who hath wrought “XXX” and “The Fast and the Furious” (but also “Stealth” and “Daylight”) - there’s an unparalleled blandness that’s hard to create given the wealth of resources a big budget action film receives. Bad enough we have to endure an overlong prologue and a stilted first act that bores via osmosis with its insistence on showing us just how timid the O’Connells’ life is in retirement, but also we’re mired in a convoluted, marginally interesting plot whose main (badly executed) theme is…family? While I’m sure dads across America will appreciate Rick O’Connell’s every third line including the word “family” in it, I got the point about five on-the-nose lines ago. Blah.

Can you blame original “Mummy” remake director Stephen Sommers for not coming back a third time for this CGI orgy without the orgasm? Or my beloved REEL DEAL Crush Rachel Weisz for not reprising her role as Evey O’Connell? Besides being devastatingly beautiful, Weisz brought a plucky, nerdy-hot charm to the role that a game and well-accented Maria Bello does not. Also missing is Oded Fehr’s charismatic badassery as a guardian warrior of the Egyptian mummy’s tomb.

Meanwhile, Fraser should’ve cashed his checks with a ski mask, stealing money in a performance that looks like he’s otherwise engaged or just passing time until the hookers and blow arrive at the wrap party. As almost-grown son Alex, Luke Ford has his moments but comes off as your average, surly, cocksure kid with run-of-the-mill daddy issues. Not to be the continuity police, but didn’t seven year-old Alex in “The Mummy Returns” sport a “dads” and “mum,” bedrock British accent while this grown Alex has some sort of American-Euro hybrid? Just another example of producorial (if it’s not a word, it is now) laziness unmatched since Kevin Costner dropped his accent midway through “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves.”

I liked the idea that the producers took “The Mummy” to China as a way to keep the series fresh. Unless they bring back Rachel, Oded, and Stephen, this crass attempt at the commercialization of a billion-person Chinese market around the same time the eyes of the world will descend upon it will undoubtedly kill the franchise - and otherwise ill-founded comparisons to much better adventure flicks.

@ REEL
(ONE REEL)
If you can’t sneak in, don’t go in.

UTC’s resident film critic Edwardo Jackson is the author of the novels EVER AFTER and NEVA HAFTA, (Villard/Random House), a writer for The 213 Magazine, and an LA-based screenwriter. Visit his website at www.edwardojackson.com where his new novel I DO? is available NOW.


Email This Post Email This Post

Leave a Comment

Comments

August 1st, 2008 at 11:58 pm SweetSis says:

#1 Stunna

August 2nd, 2008 at 12:01 am SweetSis says:

Believe it or not, I like Brenden Frasier! But with one reel I may have to pass. I trust my critic :)

August 2nd, 2008 at 1:00 am kamalp says:

I’ma take yo word for it dude; Wack.

August 2nd, 2008 at 10:22 am Tawnie says:

Hell no! I won’t no go!

August 2nd, 2008 at 10:22 am Tawnie says:

I MEANT
Hell no! I WON’T GO!

August 2nd, 2008 at 1:52 pm randee ran says:

I saw it :(

August 2nd, 2008 at 11:18 pm UncleD says:

WHEW!!!!! @ Meanwhile, Fraser should’ve cashed his checks with a ski mask, stealing money in a performance that looks like he’s otherwise engaged or just passing time until the hookers and blow arrive at the wrap party.

August 3rd, 2008 at 12:03 pm Red Razor says:

From Fast & The Furious to this means that dude fell off.

August 3rd, 2008 at 2:20 pm Chatty Cathy says:

I LIKED IT! I like all teh Mummys and I thought this wasn’t bad. Ah c’mon. It is not one reel!

August 3rd, 2008 at 5:57 pm Ed80 says:

Chatty Cathy, shame on u, girl.

Related Material

Related Posts

Tag Cloud

Archival

Blog Archives by Month

Other UTC Blogs