ENTERTAINMENT/FILM

An Urban Review Of
“The Chronicles Of Narnia:
Prince Caspian”

THE CHRONICLES OF NARNIA: PRINCE CASPIAN (PG)

MOVIE BIASES:
Wasn’t sprung on the first one, but the action definitely looks better in this one.

MAJOR PLAYERS:
Ben Barnes (Stardust), Peter Dinklage (The Station Agent), Liam Neeson (Kinsey), and co-writer/director Andrew Adamson (The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe).

Georgie’s back! Only the most discriminating, long-term REEL DEAL readers (Mom) will remember my REEL DEAL crush on the best thing from that pseudo-spectacular that printed money worldwide known as “The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe.” The adorable Georgie Henley as Lucy Pevensie. Thanks to the relentless Disney marketing machine and a ridiculous, nine-digit worldwide gross, she’s back, with reinforcements.

One year later in WWII England for the Pevensie kids is 1300 years for Narnia. Throne-hungry Miraz (Sergio Castellitto) chases off his nephew and heir to the throne Prince Caspian (Barnes), hell-bent on exterminating the few remaining forest-dwelling, animal-friendly Narnians. Blowing a magical horn that brings the Pevensies back to Narnia to help lead a revolt against Miraz, Caspian sets ou t to bring peace between the Narnians and his native Telmarines, in spite of his uncle’s best, warlike efforts.

This ain’t your baby cousin’s “Narnia.” So dark in tenor that Starbucks could slap a $5 price tag and serve it as coffee, “Narnia” ramps up the action, albeit of the kiddie, bloodless, basic stage combat variety (how Disney bought, er, received a PG rating is beyond me; just another example of America’s double-standard when it comes to violence versus sex, and corporate influence versus independent spirit).

Once again, the production values are pretty stalwart, from the award-winning costume design by Isis Mussenden (nice “Gladiator”-style armored battle masks) to the impressive, continuously ominous musical score by Harry Gregson-Williams (Narnia I). Andrew Adamson is in fine form here, orchestrating the proceedings for maximum action-mum. As with the first “Narnia,” the special effects are special, but not mind-blowing, aiding the fantasy world enough to service the story. Yet, it’s the staging of several action set pieces, including a George Lucas-worthy, multi-tiered, third act battle royale, which really differentiates itself from its family-friendly but watered-down predecessor. With Telmarines on the warpath, numerous swordfights, and chases a-plenty, Adamson’s “Narnia” is an entertaining refresher on just how much you can get done with a bow and arrow, a broadsword, and animals that can speak.

“You may find Narnia a more savage place than you remember.” And hairier. The bad guys, a.k.a. Telmarines, led by shady Miraz, sport sinister Fu Manchus, goatees, and all manner of dubious facial hair to broadcast their cruel intentions. Centaurs roam the woods ready to rumble. Eddie Izzard (TV’s “The Riches”) voices a feisty, sword-wielding mouse alongside Peter Dinklage’s unsentimental, cuttingly dry dwarf soldier. Barnes, with his dark, floppy, Abercrombie-ready hair and nobility-inducing cleft chin, is dutifully gallant, even while promoting a curiously Eurotrash, Eastern Bloc-ish accent.

Not missing a beat, the actors behind the Pevensie children all contribute in significant ways: archer Susan (Anna Popplewell), diplomat Edmund (Skandar Keynes), hopeful Lucy (Georgie!), and swordsman/high king Peter (William Moseley; his alpha dog tussle with Prince Caspian over group leadership dynamics is somewhat amusing).

Even in face of all this frivolity, I have a gripe. My biggest gripe with the first “Narnia” and less so, but still present in this one, is that for those unfamiliar with the world of the books, it seems as if the rules and physics of that world can arbitrarily shift to suit story purposes on a whim. There’s a lot of pining for Aslan the triumphant, talking lion warrior-king. Yet, I’m never exactly sure why he doesn’t appear or what it would take to bring him out besides the hopes and dreams of an (admittedly enchanting) little girl.

Speaking of Aslan, who’s obviously an allegoric placeholder for God, “Narnia’s” script gets a touch saggy in the middle in trying to serve all its masters, offering a stealth religious-based theme of when all else fails, it’s time for a little faith. Offsetting (or adding to?) such a simplistic, moralistic message is a nice little Spygate-Roger Clemens moment, where the temptation to cheat to get ahead is overwhelming to the underdog Pevensie revolutionaries.

More isn’t always good, but in this case more IS better. More action, more set design, more Georgie!

@@@ REELS

(THREE REELS)

It’s pretty hot, go give it a shot.

Like what you read? Agree/disagree with The Reel Deal? Think he’s talkin’ out his…HUSH YO’ MOUF! (I’m only talkin’ about The Reel Deal!) Email him at EJAce1@GMail.com!

Edwardo Jackson is the author of the novels EVER AFTER and NEVA HAFTA, (Villard/Random House), a writer for The 213 Magazine, and an LA-based screenwriter. Visit his website at www.edwardojackson.com where his new novel I DO? is available NOW.


Email This Post Email This Post

Leave a Comment

Comments

May 17th, 2008 at 3:34 am SweetSis says:

Saturday matinee was sold out. Couldn’t see it if I wanted too. We went & saw Forgetting Sarah Marshall & I laughed my patootie off.

May 17th, 2008 at 11:39 am Ed80 says:

DVD

May 17th, 2008 at 12:05 pm juskickin says:

i heard it was racist!

May 17th, 2008 at 12:08 pm thelma says:

no kids means i ain’t checking for this one!

May 17th, 2008 at 1:21 pm juskickin says:

is the book any good?

May 17th, 2008 at 2:03 pm young clean bastard says:

this made me tired just readin it.

May 17th, 2008 at 4:39 pm hisherness says:

@juskickin the books are wonderful, a central part of my library as a child. i still have them, and still read them from time to time. the movie series would have done well to proceed in chronological, rather than publication, order (making the follow up the horse and his boy rather than prince caspian). the books were written around 1950, so several “ists” we no longer find acceptable may be expected.

May 17th, 2008 at 8:10 pm Regina Holloway says:

the books are a treasure. part one of the films was spectacular. a real visual event and i thought very true to the story. i am looking forward to seeing this.

May 17th, 2008 at 10:22 pm Binta Rohan says:

I saw it! Really liked it! It was probably all over my heard but for what I could understand, it was a fun ride with the kids.

May 17th, 2008 at 10:44 pm kamalp says:

gonna take your word for it my man

May 17th, 2008 at 11:43 pm Elsa Harkins says:

i took my nephew to see it last night and i was taken aback by the violence. i agree. dont know how this got that rating.

May 18th, 2008 at 9:42 am Evelyn says:

you made it sound good. i’m going to check it out on a matinee today.

May 18th, 2008 at 10:04 am PRECIOUS says:

Prince Caspian is a fantasy
Its worth a shot I agree
I even dig the Telemarines
Those Spainard warriors who call Miraz King
But its not as good as the Lord of the Rings
And judging from the boxoffice sting
Disney will not be seeing bling

May 18th, 2008 at 11:10 am Edwardo Jackson says:

Thank you, Precious. Thanks to your poem, this post is now complete!

Call me spoiled but where was the Precious poem for the Summer Movie Preview?!?

Spoiled rotten,

TRD

May 18th, 2008 at 2:49 pm Heaven Roberts says:

i liked one a lot. i’ll probably catch it next weekend.

May 18th, 2008 at 4:08 pm MissReina says:

It sounds like 2+ hoursyou’ll never get back.

May 18th, 2008 at 9:39 pm hootiehoo says:

heard it kicked butt at box office its just not my steelo