POLITICS

Bush Boycott? Yeah Right!

Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton both say that President Bush should boycott the opening ceremonies of the upcoming Summer Olympics in Beijing, to protest China’s abysmal human rights record. A resolution is working its way through the House of Representatives calling for the same thing. Bush probably won’t boycott, and even if he does it will be a hollow gesture given his own policies.

The idea of George W. Bush taking a moral stand against human suffering is laughable. After all, he’s the guy who stood by and did nothing while the victims of our nation’s worst natural disaster (Hurricane Katrina) lay trapped amid filth and fear in the flooded ruins of a historic American city (New Orleans). And, of course, there’s the Iraq War which has brought out the worst in the Bush Administration.

Less than two weeks ago the State Department (with full support of the President) renewed the contract for Blackwater Worldwide, the private “security” company which has wounded and killed numerous Iraqi civilians while escorting U.S. diplomats. The contract was extended even though the FBI is investigating a Blackwater shooting (labeled a “massacre” by Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki) that left 17 Iraqis (including women and children) dead last September. Bush insists that Blackwater is not accountable to U.S. law, Iraqi law, International Law or American military law. So, no matter what atrocities they commit, they can never be prosecuted.

A few weeks before issuing Blackwater a shiny new free pass, President Bush vetoed a bill that would have barred the CIA from using torture techniques such as water boarding (simulated drowning). According to the president, torture is “one of the most valuable tools in the war on terror.” Of course Mr. Bush never uses the word “torture.” He prefers “enhanced interrogation methods.” But you know what Shakespeare said: “a rose by any other name…”

Of course we could go on. These are just a few recent examples of the moral failures that would dilute the impact of President Bush boycotting the opening of the Beijing Olympics. Still, despite everything that is wrong with his administration, Mr. Bush does represent the United States, so if he skipped the opening that would make a statement. Don’t hold your breath.

Even if President Bush actually wanted to confront China over human rights issues (which he does not), he probably won’t because China’s holding a lot of paper on us. Where did Bush find $600 billion to finance the Iraq War? A big chunk of it was borrowed from China.

Meanwhile, International Olympic Committee (IOC) president Jacques Rogge says the chaos that has followed the Torch Relay is a “crisis” for the Olympic movement. Oh, like they didn’t see this coming? Please! Grassroots rage over China’s oppression of Tibet (and the Western nations’ timid response to that oppression) has been boiling around the globe for years. China is also under fire for buying oil from Darfur while refusing to challenge the genocide there. So, the IOC should’ve known they were asking for trouble seven years ago when they awarded Beijing the honor of hosting the 2008 Summer Games. We can expect a lot more protests before and during this summer’s Olympics. But don’t expect our President to take part in them.

THINK! IT AIN’T ILLEGAL…YET!

Cameron Turner is a Los Angeles-area native whose editorials, entertainment news features and audio documentaries have appeared on national radio networks, online and in print for over 20 years.


Email This Post Email This Post

Leave a Comment

Comments

April 17th, 2008 at 3:19 am missme says:

It never stops with Bush does it. Just a hot mess.

April 17th, 2008 at 5:39 am Howard W. says:

I’m glad that a discussion of a Beijing boycott is happening on this site. Here’s the thing that is curious to me. Why all of a sudden is a potential boycott blanketing the news as it relates to Chinese injustices toward Tibet? Why do the atrocities that China has helped finance in Darfur continue to miss the same spotlight? Many organizations tried to raise awareness of China’s bankrolling of Darfur horrors and were met with mild media interest. So why now that Tibet is part of the “parade of horrors” is the media paying attention so much more than when it was restricted to an African nation? I think the answer is obvious and awful.

April 17th, 2008 at 2:10 pm ttj says:

Are we so caught up that we are becoming to dependent on China?

April 17th, 2008 at 8:22 pm hisherness says:

Blackwater not accountable under military law my hind end. If the troops have to obey LOAC (and they don’t get the equipment and other perks available to Blackwater), then why not this mercenary organization?

April 17th, 2008 at 8:46 pm Kenneth Boston says:

Bush should be brought up on criminal charges before the world court. Iraq, Afghanistan, Blackwater, 911, Abu Grahib, Katrina. This cat is a straight up felon.

April 17th, 2008 at 11:39 pm dollsdaughter says:

I need to get up on this more. Where can I read something to get up to date on this whole China-Darfur-Tibet controversy?

April 21st, 2008 at 12:20 pm thelma says:

this is so true - bush couldn’t point to a decent human rights record if he tried. and his wack leadership mistakes will follow the next president and the one after that. a mess

November 12th, 2008 at 3:59 pm Noemi Hoffman says:

m9xg4ss3xb5h2pxl

Related Material

Related Posts

Tag Cloud

Archival

Blog Archives by Month

Other UTC Blogs